About your Search

20100129
20100129
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)
$200 million, but most of all, even if you paid us back, new york city back, the $200 million, what's it going to do to merchants in the so-called frozen zone in that area? nobody is going to go to china town and say let's walk the streets, honey. khalid sheik muhammad is down in a trial for two years. >> dianne feinstein has a reason why this changed so quickly. she said the trial should be moved because the dynamic has now changed. >> this is significant. >> right. because of umar farouk abdulmutallab. let's see what she had to say. >> i think the mayor has spoken. i think he has a good point. i think the administration should listen to that point. ksm does not have to be tried in new york city. if there's any evidence that this is going to either make new york city a target or present unusual expenses and the mayor and i've been a mayor should be listened to. and what he has said is yes, it will. >> where is senator schumer and senator jillibrand. >> they're in trouble. >> why? >> i'll tell you why. i'm starting to understand the whole tea party town hall movement. people send
that didn't cost a billion dollars, which using downtown will, and it will also impact traffic and commerce and peoples' lifestyles downtown and it would be great if we didn't do it. my hope is that the attorney general and the president decide to change their mind, but if they don't, we will provide the security that will keep everybody safe. bill: in the meantime, looks like it's not going to happen. anyway, we think it's a reversal. good morning, that's where we start, i'm bill hemmer on a friday. martha: good morning, bill, and good morning, everybody, on friday morning, i'm martha maccallum, big news we've just been talking about, the justice department is now exploring other venue options for the trial for ksm and others in the 9/11 cases. the ultimate decision, though, really lies with congress in the end. bill: we're hearing from republicans, and now a bipartisan chorus of sorts, opposition to that growing question, ultimately, where would you go? eric shawn, following developments live in new york. first from the beginning, what happened? >> reporter: bill, it could be a big blow t
: hi, i'm bill o'reilly, thanks for watching us tonight. is the president's speech over yet? that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. that was a long deal last night, was it not? but i have to say the president delivered his speech very well. he seemed relaxed and in charge. because i am a simple man, as you know. i'm going to break the state of the union down in a very basic way and i will do it in three minutes, not 70. big theme of the night was job creation. the president believes the government should spend a ton of money providing jobs for the folks who don't have them. okay. i get it. but, with the deficit so huge, my simple question is why not try private incentives first? mr. obama is proposing tax break force american businesses to create jobs. that's good. tax cuts will stimulate spending so we need more of those. and let's bend over backwards to help small companies hire folks. private business the backbone in our economy and always has been. so talking points opposes massive federal spending on the job front unless the tax breaks don't work. ke
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)